Current:Home > NewsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -ValueCore
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-19 03:44:39
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (19131)
Related
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Body of hostage Yehudit Weiss recovered in building near Gaza's Al-Shifa Hospital, IDF says
- Alabama police chief says department policies violated in fatal shooting of Black man outside home
- Univision cozies up to Trump, proving the Latino vote is very much in play in 2024
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Horoscopes Today, November 18, 2023
- Looming volcano eruption in Iceland leaves evacuated small town in limbo: The lava is under our house
- Ben Dunne, an Irish supermarket heir who survived an IRA kidnapping and a scandal, dies at 74
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- US Defense Secretary Austin makes unannounced visit to Ukraine
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Rosalynn Carter: A life in photos
- AP Top 25: Ohio State jumps Michigan, moves to No. 2. Washington, FSU flip-flop at Nos. 4-5
- Canned seafood moves beyond tuna sandwiches in a pandemic trend that stuck
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- School district and The Satanic Temple reach agreement in lawsuit over After School Satan Club
- Who is playing in the Big 12 Championship game? A timeline of league's tiebreaker confusion
- Donna Kelce Proves Jason and Travis Kelce's Bond Extends Far Beyond Football
Recommendation
Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
Taylor Swift postpones Saturday Rio show due to high temperatures
Moviegoers feast on 'The Hunger Games' prequel, the weekend's big winner: No. 1 and $44M
NFL playoff picture: Browns, Cowboys both rise after Week 11
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
Notable quotes from former first lady Rosalynn Carter
What is the healthiest chocolate? How milk, dark and white stack up.
5 common family challenges around the holidays and how to navigate them, according to therapists