Current:Home > MarketsRepublican lawmakers in Kentucky offer legislation to regulate adult-oriented businesses -ValueCore
Republican lawmakers in Kentucky offer legislation to regulate adult-oriented businesses
View
Date:2025-04-16 08:25:25
FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) — Republican lawmakers proposed making adult-oriented businesses off-limits within a block of places frequented by children as they offered legislation on Tuesday that includes a renewed effort to regulate drag shows in Kentucky.
Identical Senate and House bills unveiled by Sen. Lindsey Tichenor and Rep. Nancy Tate would create statewide regulations for adult businesses. Local governments could impose even stronger measures.
The legislation would prohibit such businesses from operating within a city block — or about 930 feet (285 meters) — of an established school, childcare center, park, recreational area, place of worship or children’s amusement business. Any existing adult business currently within that buffer zone would be given five years to comply with the legislation.
The two lawmakers told reporters that the goal is to protect children from sexually explicit content.
“It is our responsibility as adults to protect the innocence of their minds and bodies,” Tate said.
Their legislation would prohibit minors from entering adult-oriented businesses and would prohibit those businesses from having outside displays of nudity or sexual conduct.
The measures define adult-oriented businesses to include any adult arcade, adult book or video store, adult cabaret, adult theater or any establishment hosting sexually explicit drag performances or any other performance involving sexual conduct.
Adult businesses violating those restrictions could lose their business and liquor licenses.
There are no criminal penalties in the bills.
The bills would renew an effort to regulate drag shows in the Bluegrass State. Last year, a measure would have prohibited drag shows on public property or in places where adult performances could be viewed by children. During highly charged debates, supporters touted it as a child-protection measure while opponents said it would have stifled First Amendment rights.
Tichenor said Tuesday that the new legislation isn’t intended to impede free speech rights.
“This is not to limit drag,” Tichenor said at a news conference. “This is not to limit access to adult content. It is strictly to keep children away from sexually explicit content.”
The bills would prohibit sexually explicit drag performances in places frequented by children, such as libraries, Tate said.
Asked who would decide what’s deemed sexually explicit, Tichenor replied: “It is defined in the bill pretty extensively. And it would be up to the communities. Obviously, a resident, a county attorney could bring forth a civil cause and question the performance and it would move forward from there.”
Supporters of the bills are hoping to avoid the time constraints that derailed their efforts last year. The 2023 legislation cleared the Senate but its supporters ran out of time in the House. Both chambers have Republican supermajorities. This year’s legislative session lasts 60 days. Last year’s session was 30 days.
This year’s bills were offered on day 20 of this year’s session. If both measures advance, legislative leaders eventually would decide which one would ultimately move forward.
veryGood! (17)
Related
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- A new film explains how the smartphone market slipped through BlackBerry's hands
- Inside Julia Roberts' Busy, Blissful Family World as a Mom of 3 Teenagers
- Your Mission: Enjoy These 61 Facts About Tom Cruise
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Natural Gas Samples Taken from Boston-Area Homes Contained Numerous Toxic Compounds, a New Harvard Study Finds
- Writers Guild of America goes on strike
- What has been driving inflation? Economists' thinking may have changed
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Indian Court Rules That Nature Has Legal Status on Par With Humans—and That Humans Are Required to Protect It
Ranking
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- As SpaceX Grows, So Do Complaints From Environmentalists, Indigenous Groups and Brownsville Residents
- President Biden: Climate champion or fossil fuel friend?
- Today’s Al Roker Is a Grandpa, Daughter Courtney Welcomes First Baby With Wesley Laga
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- He's trying to fix the IRS and has $80 billion to play with. This is his plan
- More Mountain Glacier Collapses Feared as Heat Waves Engulf the Northern Hemisphere
- President Biden: Climate champion or fossil fuel friend?
Recommendation
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
These Clergy Are Bridging the Gap Between Religion and Climate
The racial work gap for financial advisors
In BuzzFeed fashion, 5 takeaways from Ben Smith's 'Traffic'
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Pregnant Kourtney Kardashian Showcases Baby Bump in Elevator Selfie
Nearly a third of nurses nationwide say they are likely to leave the profession
Fossil Fuels Aren’t Just Harming the Planet. They’re Making Us Sick